Bacteria Testing Reference Guide
- Pilar G. Burkhard
- Apr 4, 2024
- 2 min read
Why Testing for Bacteria in Water is Important
Controlling mineral scales, biological deposits, foulants and corrosion through the appropriate use of filtration equipment and treatment products helps maintain water system cleanliness, hygiene, and efficiency, as well as minimizing microbial growth. Regularly testing for bacteria contamination can either verify a treatment plan is working or be an indication of a problem that needs to be addressed.

Proper monitoring and maintenance can also prevent the spread of water borne pathogens and diseases such as Legionella and minimize health risks to people and the surrounding environment.
Special Methods for Collecting Samples for Bacteria Analysis
Appropriate sampling is essential to provide representative samples to the laboratory in charge of testing. Sampling requirements depend on the objective of sampling, and on the method requested.

Sample Containers
For routine sampling, use new sterile bottles. The volume of the bottles should be adequate for analysis of all requested parameters. If the water is being treated by an oxidant (e.g. chlorine, chloramine, bromine, or ozone), a reducing agent should be added to stop the action of oxidation as soon as the sample is taken such as sodium thiosulfate.
Chem Inc. stocks sterile 250 mL and 1000 mL bottles for bacteria sampling. All sterile sample bottles provided by Chem Inc. contain sodium thiosulfate.
Transportation and Storage
Keep the time between sampling and analysis in the laboratory as short as possible. For drinking water, analysis should ideally be started within the same working day.
Cool samples — ideally (5 ± 3) °C — during transport (e.g. by using ice packs or melting ice), unless otherwise stated. Take care not to freeze samples and to protect samples from sunlight.
Time Delay
The delay between sampling and analysis includes transport, receiving, and processing in the laboratory.
Time delay between sampling and analysis may reduce the reliability of the results. Consequently, samplers and analysts shall work together to keep time delays as short as possible. Sample collection and receiving dates are noted on laboratory reports.
Please be aware that for Legionella testing, the maximum hold time is 48 hours for ISO method and 72 hours for CDC Method.
If you are unsure of the specific testing requirements for the analysis requested, please contact lab personnel.
Bacteria Testing Reference Table
Bacteria Analysis | Turn Around Time | Results Given and/or Interpretation | Special Notes | When/Why this test is important |
Total Aerobic Bacteria | 2 days | 0 – 3,000 CFU/mL | When a problem is detected, you may want to conduct more testing to determine the nature of the microbial problem. | Aerobic bacteria can cause several problems in water, including slime formations, turbidity, taste and odor, corrosion, health risks, and hygiene risks. |
ATP (Adenosine triphosphate) Free, Total, and Microbial | 1 day | RLU (Relative Light Units) is directly proportional to the amount of ATP collected from the sample. A high RLU indicates a large amount of ATP.
Because colony forming units (CFU) and RLU values are determined using different test methods and measure different substances, RLU values do not consistently correlate to CFU when testing samples. | ATP is an indicator for the presence of biological residues due to its universal presence in all living cells. | Fast and easy test to perform.
“Free” measures dissolved ATP that is free in solution (non-microbial ATP), while “Total” measures both free ATP in solution and microbial ATP. Therefore, the difference between Total and Free ATP provides a measure of microbial contamination in the sample. |
Total Coliform Bacteria / E coli. | 2 days | Present or Absent | Not all coliform bacteria are harmful to your health, but E. coli is. E. coli is a type of fecal coliform bacteria | For drinking water quality
Indicator of fecal contamination |
Denitrifying Bacteria | Up to 6 days | Aggressive: 1,800,000 – 215,000 CFU/mL
Moderate: 25,000 – 3,000 CFU/mL
Not Aggressive: 350 - <50 CFU/mL | These bacteria reduce nitrate to nitrite, and some continue nitrification to gaseous nitrogen (complete denitrification).
If highly aggressive bacteria are detected, the water should be tested for the presence of coliform bacteria. | The presence of denitrifying bacteria can indicate that the water has been polluted by nitrogen-rich organics from sources such as compromised septic tanks, sewage systems, industrial and hazardous waste sites. |
Heterotrophic Plate Count | 2 days | 0 – 300 CFU/mL | Tests for Heterotrophic bacteria (Total Bacteria Count/ Total Plate Count) including Pseudomonas, Salmonella, Escherichia, Rhizobium, etc. Aerobic and anaerobic | For drinking water quality
Some heterotrophic bacteria may be pathogenic and/or decompose organic matter in water.
|
Hydrogen Sulfide Producing Bacteria* | 2 days | Present or Absent | Detection of Salmonella, Citrobacter, Proteus, Edwardsiella, and Klebsiella. Mostly found in fecal material. It is a type of Sulfate Reducing bacteria. | Hydrogen sulfide can cause several significant problems in water. Problems range from “rotten egg” odors to the blackening of equipment, slime formations, and the initiation of corrosive processes. |
Iron-Related Bacteria | Up to 10 days | Aggressive: 570,000 – 9,000 CFU/mL
Moderate: 2,200 – 25 CFU/mL
Not Aggressive: 9 - <1 CFU/mL | Iron-related bacteria can use iron in their metabolism. This test can detect both iron-oxidizing and iron-reducing bacteria. Common iron-related bacteria include Gallionella, Crenothrix, Sphaerotilus, Siderocapsa, and Thiobacillus ferroxidans. | Taste and odor problems and “red water” are common symptoms of problems due to iron-related bacteria. |
Legionella | 7-10 days | Potable: ≥0.1 CFU/mL
Non-Potable: ≥10 CFU/mL | L.pneumophila serogroup 1 and serogroup 2-14 are responsible for most hospitalizations. However, there are over 100 species of Legionella which have the potential to cause harm. Therefore, any positive detection of Legionella should be taken seriously. | Legionella bacteria transmits through water aerosols such as mist or spray. Therefore, locations such as showerheads, sink faucets, cooling towers, hot tubs, and fountains are potential sources for human infection. |
Myco-bacterium | Up to 21 days | 0 – 500 CFU/mL | Test can detect the presence of mycobacterium species including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium kansasii, Mycobacterium scrofulaceum, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium fortuitum | Mycobacterium can cause diseases such as tuberculosis in humans if exposed.
Problem in waste, surface, recreational (Fountains), and ground
Creates biofilms |
Nitrifying Bacteria | 5 days | Very Aggressive: 100,000 CFU/mL
Aggressive: 10,000 CFU/mL
Moderate: 1,000 CFU/mL
Not Aggressive: None Detected | Nitrifying bacteria recycle organic nitrogenous materials from ammonium (the endpoint for the decomposition of proteins) to nitrates. In water, aggressive nitrifiers can produce high concentrations of nitrates. Nitrates in water can be a potential health risk, particularly to infants who have not yet developed a tolerance to nitrates. | Aggressive nitrifying bacteria can indicate that the water may have been polluted by nitrogen-rich organics from sources such as compromised septic tanks, sewage systems, industrial and hazardous waste sites and is undergoing an aerobic form of degradation. |
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria* | Up to 11 days | Aggressive: 2,200,000 – 6,000 CFU/mL
Moderate: 1,400 – 75 CFU/mL
Not Aggressive: 20 - <1 CFU/mL | Sulfate-Reducing bacteria are a group of anaerobic bacteria that generate hydrogen sulfide (H2S). SRB microorganisms are difficult to detect because they are anaerobic and tend to grow deep down within biofilms (slimes) as a part of a microbial community. SRB may not be present in the free-flowing water over the site of the fouling. | SRB can cause several significant problems in water. Problems range from “rotten egg” odors to the blackening of equipment, slime formations, and the initiation of corrosive processes. |
Yeast & Mold | Up to 2.5 days | 1-150 CFU/mL | Both require free oxygen for growth and pH range of 2 – 9. Indicates organic contamination, high dissolved oxygen, and possible biofilm formation. | Tested in drinking water. May cause poor odor and taste. Should be done along with HPC |
* Hydrogen Sulfide Producing Bacteria is a type of Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (SRB)
Abbreviations and Terms
ATP | Adenosine triphosphate |
CFU/mL | Colony forming units per milliliter (unit of concentration) |
DN | Denitrifying Bacteria |
HPC | Heterotrophic Plate Count / Heterotrophic Bacteria |
IRB | Iron Related Bacteria |
RLU | Relative Light Units |
SRB | Sulfate Reducing Bacteria |




Browsing through search results led me to this interesting post, and I am glad I decided to give it a chance. The article had a very interesting approach that made the discussion feel fresh instead of repetitive. I appreciated how clearly the main ideas were explained throughout the text. The pacing also kept everything smooth and enjoyable from start to finish. Good blogs should contain more content like this. Great work.
Somewhere between random search results I found this recent article and unexpectedly read the entire thing with real interest. The explanations were clear, practical, and much more engaging than I expected at first. I especially liked that the article remained informative without trying too hard to sound complicated. The flow of the text also made the reading experience very smooth and enjoyable. Articles like this make exploring blogs much more worthwhile. Thanks for creating such strong content.
I found this full article both informative and surprisingly enjoyable. The structure made the content easy to follow, even when more detailed points were introduced. I also liked how the article avoided unnecessary repetition and kept bringing new ideas into the discussion. The tone of the writing felt calm and professional without becoming too formal. It is refreshing to discover content that values readability as much as information. Thanks for putting this together.
This was an excellent article that kept my attention all the way through. I am happy that I decided to read this post because it offered many useful insights and ideas. The content was presented clearly without becoming overly complicated. Every section contributed something valuable to the topic. It is always nice to find articles written with such care and attention. Looking forward to more content like this.
This was such an interesting article and I enjoyed every part of it. The writing style felt natural and engaging without becoming overly complicated. I also appreciated how clearly the main ideas were explained throughout the discussion. The practical examples helped make the topic easier to understand. Content like this makes browsing online much more enjoyable. Looking forward to future updates.